The Calico Cat
A blog about business, economics, law, politics, current events, and political sex scandals

click here to return to the Calico Cat homepage

Bill Clinton’s memoirs reveal he lied to grand jury

This is actually non-news, because we all know that Bill Clinton lied about everything related to his sex life. But since I like to cover political sex scandals, and the Bill Clinton Monica Lewinski relationship is the mother of all political sex scandals, it deserves a mention in the blog.

And I might add that this sex scandal produced the Starr Report, the most entertaining document ever created in the history of the United States government. It was well worth all the taxpayer money used to produce it.

According to today’s Washington Post:

Clinton's own legal battle with independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr accounts for one of the book's more peculiar revelations. In his August 1998 grand jury testimony, Clinton said he began an inappropriate sexual relationship with Monica S. Lewinsky in "early 1996." His testimony, as was widely noted at the time, was in conflict with Lewinsky's story: She testified the relationship began on Nov. 15, 1995, in the midst of a government shutdown.

Starr's prosecutors, in their report to Congress, accused Clinton of lying about the date of their relationship in order to avoid admitting that he had sexual relations with an intern, as Lewinsky still was in the fall of 1995 before being hired for a paying job in the winter.

Without explanation, in his memoir Clinton departs from his grand jury testimony and corroborates her version: "During the government shutdown in late 1995, when very few people were allowed to come to work in the White House, and those who were there were working late, I'd had an inappropriate encounter with Monica Lewinsky and would do so again on other occasions between November and April, when she left the White House for the Pentagon."

And there you have it. Clinton said one thing to the grand jury, and another thing in his book. Liar, liar, pants on fire.

posted Tuesday, June 22, 2004

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Previous Posts

  • Blogs banned in Iran and China
  • Blogger vs. Xanga
  • Is Clay Aiken gay?
  • Michelle Malkin on "dirty old men"
  • Andrew Sullivan still pushing Abu Ghraib story
  • New York Times publishes description of Paul Johns...
  • Paul Johnson beheading: was it justified?
  • Rance: why does he blog?
  • Don't invest your 401k money in company stock
  • Ladies' night is unconstitutional
  • This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?