The Calico Cat
A blog about business, economics, law, politics, current events, and political sex scandals

click here to return to the Calico Cat homepage

Response to Email about gay marriage

One of my readers sent in a long Email disagreeing with my take on gay marriage. Here is a partial quote:

First, allow me discuss your essay on gay marriage. You start out by claiming that "[heterosexual, monogamous] marriage is...a universal practice of mankind" and "a practice that is quintessentially human." This is a frequent claim, but is not borne out by scholarship on the issue. Historians and anthropologists have documented many occurances of group marriage, marriage separated from monogamy, and marriage separated from child raising. All evidence seems to suggest that marriage is entirely culturally defined.

While it is true that us humans are an adaptable bunch, and cultural customs can arise that are in opposition to our biological instincts, I'm afraid the reader is vastly exaggerating in order to make gay marriage seem like a sensible thing.

Cultures in which there exist weird practices such as group marriage and children not being raised by parents are the exception, and not the rule. Hindus in India, Buddhists in China, and Christians and Jews in the West all get married and raise children.

Having children, and raising children, is something that is obviously biologically programmed into us, otherwise we, as a race, would have died out. The forming of monogamous relationships is also something that is programmed into us. The social custom of marriage acknowledges what we want to instinctively do, but it also serves a greater purpose than that. It acts to prevent the either member of the married couple from straying, which would be detrimental to their children and to society as a whole. "Gay marriage", on the other hand, wouldn't serve any of these purposes at all.

This is not an argument, on my part, that sodomy should be made illegal. Although I do confess to having a hard time understanding why sodomy is a constitutionally protected right, but smoking marijuana isn't. After all, the disease transmitted through sodomy, AIDS, has killed hundreds of thousands of Americans, while it's not clear that marijuana has killed anybody.

posted Thursday, December 11, 2003

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Previous Posts

  • Gay marriage - a libertarian perspective
  • Index funds - the good and the bad
  • Mating response and homosexuality
  • The exporting of American jobs, revisited
  • Thanksgiving Day post about Google and Marketing
  • Metrosexual: I hate that word
  • Anti price-gouging laws
  • How I passed the New York bar exam
  • The Evil 401k
  • The Massachusetts Constitution
  • This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?