The Calico Cat
A blog about business, economics, law, politics, current events, and political sex scandals

click here to return to the Calico Cat homepage

Thanksgiving Day post about Google and Marketing

At at website called WebmasterWorld, people mostly exchange tips on how to market their websites, with the majority of interesting being on how to get your website to show up at the top of the Google search results.

A regular poster with the moniker of GoogleGuy, who claims to be an employee of Google, recently recommended that people stop worrying about the search results and just focus on creating quality websites. Time wasted trying to game Google would be better spent improving the website.

I've been thinking about this advice for the last few days, and I've come to the conclusion that it's incredibly bad advice. I don't know if GoogleGuy is intentionally trying to deceive people (for the benefit of his employer), or if he actually believes that all you have to do is come up with a great website and then it will automatically get found.

In the non-internet world, there are many types of companies that spend most of their money on marketing. People often point out that drug companies spend more money on sales and marketing than they do on R&D. And that's an especially interesting example, because their customers are doctors, who are highly educated and have a professional obligation to figure out what the best drugs are. Yet drug companies seem to think that sales and markeing deserve more resources than R&D.

Coca Cola spends practically zero on R&D and billions on marketing. Consulting companies bill out their employees at more than twice what the employees get paid. The client is paying mostly for the marketing effort. They could go directly to an employee and hire him at a signficant discount.

The classic example of marketing failure is the Sony Betamax video recording format. Betamax is allegedly a superior technology to VHS, but you don't see any Betamax VCRs around any more. Sony failed in marketing.

The unfortunate lesson of all these examples is that advertising, sales, and other marketing often require a greater share of business resources than R&D and actual manufacturing costs. This applies to both online as well as offline businesses. A mediocre product can far outsell a much higher quality product if the marketing is superior. I'm sure that some webmasters are getting worthwhile results from devoting more resources to marketing their website (with search engine traffic being the only source of marketing for many webmasters) than to improving the quality of their website.

posted Thursday, November 27, 2003

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Previous Posts

  • Metrosexual: I hate that word
  • Anti price-gouging laws
  • How I passed the New York bar exam
  • The Evil 401k
  • The Massachusetts Constitution
  • Is there a "Warrior Caste"?
  • Supermarket discount cards
  • Democrats and federal judges
  • Commentary on the post-bubble economy
  • The return of nuclear energy
  • This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?